Traditional
Learning
In
my kindergarten classroom following the rules is crucial for the students to
understand. This structure is based on the Learning
as Pursuing Rewards and Avoiding Punishment model. The teacher has her classroom
management stated clearly and is constant with it. She rewards students who do
what is expected and beyond. She also punishes those students who get more than
two warnings by sending them to the thinking chair or keeping them in from
playing outside at recess. The students know that there are consequences for
their actions and they are molded to formulate responses in this type of
environment. I always try to praise my children instead of being negative
because the classroom environment that I want my children to learn in is a
positive one. Of course, I also follow the traditional model of awards and
punishment because I too believe that students should act like well behaved
students and the only way to instill this is to reward them or punish them if they
are not being obedient. Why should students who are being off task receive the
same benefits as everyone else? Then the rest of the students will question and
begin to act the same as the disobedient child. I believe that there should be
some kind of assertiveness in the classroom or else the teacher loses all
control.
Our
math curriculum follows Enlightenment ideas because it allows the students to
manipulate objects in order to go more into depth of understanding. For
example, Locke believed that, “young children should learn from contact with
real objects, investi- gating for
themselves rather than being given verbal instruction (pg 45).” This is true
with our curriculum because it allows students to handle concrete objects
rather than just memorizing facts over and over again. In the more traditional
ways of teaching the students would have to learn through memorizing. They did
not engage in any of the activities and were not given opportunities to explore
the skills given to them. As we see in the reading children spent their time memorizing, reciting, and
reproducing their lessons to demonstrate that they had acquired knowledge (65).
Contemporary
Learning
The
Enlightenment movement was the beginning of people trying to understand the
meaning of knowledge and learning. It was not so much about going out and
finding knowledge it was more about understanding that knowledge was in us all
along. It is up to us to explore our own knowledge and all the possibilities of
learning that can come from it. In our current curriculum there are times where
students have to memorize and recite, however most of the time the students are
allowed to practice the skills they are taught. There are activities produced
to allow students to explore phonemic awareness and math skills on their own
through literacy centers and math centers. This follows the contemporary theory
by Piaget, “According to Piaget, children, like
"little scientists," investigate and learn pretty much on their own,
using the environment as their laboratory. Like real scientists, their
explorations are partly self-directed and partly random or unplanned. Throughout
childhood, they are curious and Inclined to experiment. They not only take
advantage of learning experiences but also create these learning opportunities
for themselves (pg 69).” I believe that every student is a little scientist and
should be given ample opportunities to act like a scientist. They take in so
much information and retain it, however as teachers we should allow them to dig
deeper and practice the skills given to them.
It seems your kindergarten experience is very similar to mine. The traditional reward/punishment model is the same we use in my classroom. It seems to work very well! This is one traditional method that has been around for a long time for a reason.
ReplyDeleteI really like to see that your students are being treated like the little scientists they are in the classroom! I agree with Piaget in that students learn best from experimenting and opportunities on their own rather than memorizing facts. This is an excellent way to incorporate some contemporary theories into the classroom.
I agree that there should be a punish and reward system but sometimes I am reluctant to reward students who are doing what they are suppose to just to set an example for other students. It is funny how many curriculum is solely based on memorizing facts because there is not enough time given for more critical thing or grasping the concept conceptually.
ReplyDeleteOur classrooms are structured with a reward/punishment system. I recently read how one teacher decided to make his lessons the reward (they were highly engaging and used a hands on approach such as what Locke speaks of). If the students were not behaving appropriately, then they were to stand in the background and simply watch the activities taking place. In theory this sounds pretty amazing to me...but I am not so sure how kindergarteners would respond to this type of a system. However, I have found with my first graders that if the lesson is exciting and hands-on I do not have to work for the attention and/or good behavior.
ReplyDeleteI like that your program encourages the students to investigate and actually manipulate the objects as I think that is key especially with the kindergarteners in which your work with in the classroom. I agree with you in that students should be encouraged to be like scientists and not simply work with worksheets and no objects whatsoever. I think this can help students gain a deeper understanding like you suggest.
ReplyDeleteIs anyone else but me disturbed by the fact that "the thinking chair" is a place of punishment? I'd be afraid that students will start associating (in good behaviorist fashion) sitting quietly and "thinking" with having done something wrong. Pretty much not the outcome you want. I agree that students should know what is expected of them and should be held accountable when they don't meet that expectation, but I also strongly believe that if you want children to pay attention, you have to do something worthy of attention. If you want children to listen to you, say something they will want to hear. Rapt attention has to be elicited, it isn't something most kindergarteners can turn on and off, at-will, like a faucet. Stephanie's story is a good one: "I have found with my first graders that if the lesson is exciting and hands-on, I do not have to work for the attention and/or good behavior." Exactly.
ReplyDelete